Characterization and Volumetric Stability of High-Plasticity Clay Stabilized by Fly Ash and Metakaolin Based Geopolymers

Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 2026 , Pages 312-328

Authors

Zahraa Rashid 1 ; Chra Othman Mahmood 1

1 Koya University, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Koya, KR, Iraq

DOI logo 10.17656/sjes.10213

Keywords

Abstract


This study aims to characterize and analyze the physical and chemical performance of CH clay soil stabilized independently and separately by fly ash and metakaolin based geopolymers activated by sodium hydroxide. Different percentages up to 18% of both geopolymers were considered to assess how they affect soil plasticity, compaction and volumetric stability. The X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis for soil and binders were conducted to assess aluminosilicate amounts necessary for geopolymer formation and to support the observed results. The results of Atterberg’s limits and compaction tests showed a decrease in soil plasticity and increase in maximum dry density of soil with increase in geopolymer content. Durability was evaluated through one-dimensional swelling-shrinkage cycles, where higher binder contents resulted in pronounced volume change reduction and hence improvement of dimensional stability due to moisture changes. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed a dense and compact matrix with continuous geopolymer gel formation and enhanced interparticle bonding. The findings of these tests show that sodium hydroxide activated geopolymer binders can alter the physio-chemical properties and matrix of clay soil to improve its dimensional stability and wetting-drying cycle durability.

References


  1. Nelson, J. D., & Miller, D. J. (1997). Expansive soils: Problems and practice in foundation and pavement engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Chen, F. H. (2012). Foundations on expansive soils. Elsevier.
  3. Johnson, L. D. (1969). Review of literature on expansive clay soils.
  4. Horpibulsuk, S., Phetchuay, C., Chinkulkijniwat, A., & Cholaphatsorn, A. (2013). Strength development in silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Soils and Foundations, 53(4), 477–486.
  5. Abass, I. K. (2013). Lime stabilization of expansive soil. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 17, 219–232.
  6. Zumrawi, M. M., & Hamza, O. S. (2014). Improving the characteristics of expansive subgrade soils using lime and fly ash. International Journal of Science and Research, 3, 1124–1129.
  7. Al-Rawas, A. A., Hago, A., & Al-Sarmi, H. (2005). Effect of lime, cement and Sarooj (artificial pozzolan) on the swelling potential of an expansive soil from Oman. Building and Environment, 40(5), 681–687.
  8. Ige, O. E., & Kabeya, M. (2025). Decarbonizing the cement industry: Technological, economic, and policy barriers to CO₂ mitigation adoption. Clean Technologies, 7, 85.
  9. Andrew, R. M. (2018). Global CO₂ emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data, 10, 195–217.
  10. Habert, G., De Lacaillerie, J. D. E., & Roussel, N. (2011). An environmental evaluation of geopolymer-based concrete production: Reviewing current research trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1229–1238.
  11. Garcia-Lodeiro, I., Palomo, A., & Fernández-Jiménez, A. (2014). An overview of the chemistry of alkali-activated cement-based binders. In Handbook of alkali-activated cements, mortars and concretes (pp. 19–47). Woodhead Publishing.
  12. Yang, K.-H., Jung, Y.-B., Cho, M.-S., & Tae, S.-H. (2015). Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on reduction of CO₂ emissions from concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 774–783.
  13. Provis, J. L., & Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2009). Geopolymers: Structures, processing, properties and industrial applications. Woodhead Publishing.
  14. Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37, 1633–1656.
  15. Mohan Kumar, S., Kinuthia, J., Oti, J., & Adeleke, B. (2025). Geopolymer chemistry and composition: A comprehensive review of synthesis, reaction mechanisms, and material properties oriented with sustainable construction. Balance, 11, 26.
  16. Adhikari, B., Khattak, M. J., & Adhikari, S. (2021). Mechanical and durability characteristics of fly ash-based soil–geopolymer mixtures for pavement base and subbase layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22(9), 1193–1212.
  17. Khadka, S. D., Jayawickrama, P. W., & Senadheera, S. (2018). Strength and shrink/swell behavior of highly plastic clay treated with geopolymer. Transportation Research Record, 2672(52), 174–184.
  18. Fernández-Jiménez, A., & Palomo, Á. (2005). Composition and microstructure of alkali-activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(10), 1984–1992.
  19. Debanath, O. C., Rahman, M. A., Farook, S. M., & Islam, M. R. (2024). Application of ecofriendly geopolymer binder to enhance the strength and swelling properties of expansive soils. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2024, 9910728.
  20. Zhang, M., Guo, H., El-Korchi, T., Zhang, G., & Tao, M. (2013). Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 1468–1478.
  21. Cristelo, N., Glendinning, S., Miranda, T., Oliveira, D., & Silva, R. (2012). Influence of curing conditions on the performance of alkaline activated fly ash–soil mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24(2), 135–144.
  22. Kalina, R. D., Al-Shmaisani, S., Ferron, R. D., & Juenger, M. C. (2019). False positives in ASTM C618 specifications for natural pozzolans. ACI Materials Journal, 116(2), 165–172.
  23. Zailani, W., Abdullah, M., Arshad, M., Burduhos-Nergis, D., & Tahir, M. (2020). Effect of iron oxide (Fe₂O₃) on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 743, 012017). IOP Publishing.
  24. Davidovits, J. (2008). Geopolymer chemistry and applications. Geopolymer Institute.
  25. Amer, A. A., & El-Hoseny, S. (2017). Properties and performance of metakaolin pozzolanic cement pastes. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 129, 33–44.
  26. Horpibulsuk, S., Rachan, R., Chinkulkijniwat, A., Raksachon, Y., & Suddeepong, A. (2010). Analysis of strength development in cement-stabilized silty clay.
  27. Xu, H., & Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2000). The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 59(3), 247–266.
  28. Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., & Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007). Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42, 2917–2933.
  29. Cristelo, N., Glendinning, S., Miranda, T., Oliveira, D., & Silva, R. (2011). Soil stabilization using alkaline activation of fly ash for self-compacting rammed earth construction. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 267–276.
  30. Phummiphan, I., Horpibulsuk, S., Phoo-ngernkham, T., Arulrajah, A., & Shen, S. L. (2016). Marginal lateritic soil stabilized with high-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 17(4), 877–891.
  31. Provis, J. L. (2009). Activating solution chemistry for geopolymers. In Geopolymers (pp. 50–71). Woodhead Publishing.
  32. Abdullah, M. S., & Ahmad, F. (2017). Effect of alkaline activator to fly ash ratio for geopolymer stabilized soil. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 103, 01012). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710301012
  33. Parhi, P. S., Garanayak, L., Mahamaya, M., & Das, S. K. (2017). Stabilization of an expansive soil using alkali-activated fly ash-based geopolymer. In Sustainable civil infrastructures: Innovative infrastructure geotechnology (pp. 36–50). Springer.
  34. Dheyab, W., Ismael, Z. T., Hussein, M. A., & Huat, B. B. K. (2019). Soil stabilization with geopolymers for low-cost and environmentally friendly construction. GEOMATE Journal, 17, 271–280.
  35. Shihab, A. M., Abbas, J. M., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2018). Effects of temperature in different initial duration time for soft clay stabilized by fly ash-based geopolymer. Civil Engineering Journal, 4, 2082–2096.
  36. Abdila, S. R., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Ahmad, R., Rahim, S. Z. A., Rychta, M., Wnuk, I., Nabiałek, M., Muskalski, K., Tahir, M. F. M., & Syafwandi. (2021). Evaluation on the mechanical properties of ground granulated blast slag (GGBS) and fly ash stabilized soil via geopolymer process. Materials, 14, 2833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112833
  37. Abdila, S. R., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Ahmad, R., Burduhos Nergis, D. D., Rahim, S. Z. A., Omar, M. F., Sandu, A. V., Vizureanu, P., & Syafwandi. (2022). Potential of soil stabilization using ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and fly ash via geopolymerization method: A review. Materials, 15, 375.
  38. Sharma, K., & Kumar, A. (2020). Utilization of industrial waste-based geopolymers as a soil stabilizer: A review. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5, 97.
  39. Chindaprasirt, P., Jaturapitakkul, C., Chalee, W., & Rattanasak, U. (2009). Comparative study on the characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash geopolymers. Waste Management, 29(2), 539–543.
  40. Kumar, B. S. M., Sreenivasulu, C., & Singh, S. P. (2021). Effects of delay time on compaction and strength properties of stabilized granular soil. In Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019 (pp. 739–752). Springer.
  41. Mishra, M., Sahoo, P. K., & Singh, S. P. (2021). Plasticity and swelling characteristics of geopolymer-treated expansive soil. In Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019 (pp. 195–209). Springer.
  42. Construction and Building Materials, 24(10), 2011–2021.
Statistics
  • Article view194
  • Downloads5
  • Published at3 May 2026

  • RIS
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • APA (7th edition)
  • MLA (9th edition)
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • Vancouver